Larkin & Lacey

Ever since President Donald Trump has been elected, people on the liberal side of the spectrum have been up in arms.

They claimed that he was bigoted and that it was going to be the end of the world if he was elected—citing frank, non-politically correct things that he said in serious debates and in somewhat-not-so-serious tweets.

Well, if there is anything that will make liberals think different of him, it is definitely not his pardoning of Sheriff Arpaio—“America’s Toughest Sheriff.” President Trump pardoned Arpaio in October of 2017, weeks before Arpaio was going to be sentenced. Arpaio was in trouble for making policies based on racially profiling minorities—specifically Latinos.

He was hard on illegal immigration and attacked the issue with a passion. Unfortunately, there is a very strong racial and ethnic component ingrained within the topic of immigration.

This topic cannot be avoided, and sometimes we come across the question of whether it is right or wrong to harass a certain population if, in fact, there really are higher proportions of illegal immigrants in that population. So, whether Sheriff Arpaio was doing something right or wrong is a debate that keeps going around in circles. Learn more about Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey:

Some people take sides and think that one stance outweighs the other. Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey are two people who think like this. They take the opposite stance of Sheriff Arpaio and believe that it is more unethical than ethical to profile people in the local Hispanic populations.

To help local Hispanic people, they created an organization that would give money to local institutions geared toward the interests of Latinos. These organizations tend to various short and long term needs of immigrants who come to the United States over the Mexican border.

Sheriff Arpaio has been accused of a lot things such as corruption, the sexual abuse of women and the sexual abuse of children. Well, accusing someone of sexually abusing people, especially children, is a pretty serious thing. Of course, when hearing about such accusations, we must have some doubt, take the information with a grain of salt and try to figure out where these accusations came from and how true they may be.

Even if Sheriff Arpaio is guilty of a lot of corruption and weird stuff, we can’t just throw accusations around, believe them and not wonder where they actually came from—especially accusations of pedophilia. To be honest, any accusation must be seriously researched.

Read more: Village Voice Media | Wikipedia and Jim Larkin |

A Controversial Presidential Pardon and the Response of the Victims to It

It is not something new that President Donald Trump has controversial standings on various issues from global warming to approach towards migrants.

The latest one is a Presidential pardon towards one of the most notorious sheriffs in the history of America. The pardon towards Sheriff Joe Arpaio has created wide anger in the society, especially people who have become victims of his misdeeds. The pardon was for contempt of court against Arpaio for ignoring court orders to refrain from racial profiling on Latinos in his Maricopa County.

Many people lashed out at the decision, and some of them were the victims of Arpaio’s torture. Among them, the most prominent names were Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin.

Both of them were media persons from Arizona, and they got arrested in 2007 by the security forces of Arpaio, the notorious Sheriff of Maricopa County during those days.

They were targeted as they used their newspaper, Phoenix New Times, to expose the custodial deaths of inmates, suicides inside his prisons, racial profiling towards Latinos, harsh campaigns against political opponents, and more. Interestingly, both of them were writing about his misdeeds from 1992 – the first time Arpaio assumed office. The reporters were arrested and put behind bars by the Sheriff from their home at midnight.

However, the Sheriff could not control the national outcry against the arrest, and he was forced to release both immediately. It was remembered as one of the darkest chapters in the history of American press freedom.

While coming to the President’s decision, Lacey said that Trump is stupid, and the recent decision in favor of Arpaio proved it. He continued that it looked like a marriage between two filthy and corrupt individuals. Read more: Jim Larkin | and Jim Larkin | Crunchbase

The decision is written on the corpses of many innocent lives lost inside the prisons of Arpaio.

The sheriff was controversial throughout his six terms and known for brutal prison conditions. He even created a tent city prison which is called multiple times as concentration camp. Interestingly, Arpaio was even accused of diverting jail funds worth $100 million along with many sex crimes where a significant percent of victims were children.

However, the racial profiling case on Latinos, Melendres v. Arpaio, finally cost him too much and received the contempt of court. More than the Presidential order, Lacey thinks that the escape of Arpaio is a mockery to the justice system.

He thinks that Arpaio escaped from even without a trial on cases where thousands of people experienced his torture. The coverage of Phoenix New Times was always a thorn for the sheriff, and he applied various measures before arresting both the reporters, says Larkin.

New Times reporters were not allowed at his press conferences, threatening reporters with legal actions, not providing county documents requested by the newspaper, and more.

The reporters think that an investigative report on Arpaio in which he and his wife were concealing many parcels of his commercial real estate would have caused the sudden provocation for their arrest. However, the continued legal battle ended with the county paying a heavy compensation to Larkin and Lacey in 2013.

Learn more about Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey:


Jeremy Goldstein, a well-known business lawyer, gave his thoughts on the best way to compensate employees in any company. This is with the condition of looking to retain them and ensure that they are satisfied and still work for the good of the company that they are employed in. Employees in the current times when there are opportunities which are so much sought for, need to be watched and handled well because just like their employers they seek to benefit from their ventures.


According to Goldstein, companies should first revise their various compensation programs for reasons such as the fact that stock values may drop at any time and this may be a problem for the employees since they will lose the value of their investment. Secondly, low economic moments may make all available options of little or no value. Finally, the accounting problems that will arise from the compensation plan could see the company lose more.


There are still a few benefits of the normal compensation plans that companies are currently working with says, Jeremy Goldstein. It is easier for the employees to understand their various stock options as they stand, the options could improve their benefits. Also, value of the stocks and employees could rise as they seek to make the company’s profits more so that they don’t lose their investments.


Goldstein’s advice to companies is to embrace the correct strategies in order to minimize the initial and current costs as well as to reduce the overhang costs. This is where the knockout strategy comes in. The knockout strategy has nowadays been embraced by many corporations, and this is mainly because of its efficiency. It has worked and served them for well over the years.


Jeremy Goldstein is the founder of Jeremy L. Goldstein Associates LLC. Thi company provides advice to businesses and corporations on their compensation plans for employees. This also includes CEOs and management teams.


Jeremy is the chair of the merger and acquisition subcommittee of the executive companies Committee of the American bar association business section. He has also overseen some of the largest corporate transactions in the last ten years.


To learn more, visit